Moreover, YouTube insists human reviewers—not automation—removed popular Windows 11 installation guides, leaving creators confused about what content violates community guidelines.
YouTube AI removal controversies erupted this week as tech content creators suspected automation was bizarrely flagging educational videos as “dangerous” or “harmful.” However, YouTube denies the YouTube AI removal claims. The YouTube AI removal controversy centered on tech tutorials that platforms had allowed for years suddenly disappearing without clear explanations. YouTube now denies that odd removals resulted from automation, claiming human reviewers made enforcement decisions.
Late Friday, a YouTube spokesperson confirmed that the platform reinstated flagged videos. Furthermore, YouTube promised to take steps ensuring similar content doesn’t face removal in the future. However, creators remain unclear why platforms took down the videos. YouTube claimed that both initial enforcement decisions and appeal decisions did not result from automation issues.
YouTube AI Removal Targets Windows 11 Installation Tutorials
Rich White, a computer technician running CyberCPU Tech, saw platforms remove two videos demonstrating workarounds to install Windows 11 on unsupported hardware. These videos attract people looking to bypass Microsoft account requirements each time developers release a new build. For tech content creators like White, “these are bread and butter videos,” he told Ars. They dependably yield “extremely high views,” he said.
Because high demand exists, many tech content creators fill their channels with these kinds of videos. White’s account has “countless” examples, he said. In the past, YouTube even featured his most popular video in the genre on a trending list. To White and others, what has changed on YouTube that triggered removals of this type of content remains unclear.
YouTube only seemed to remove recently posted content, White told Ars. However, if takedowns ever impacted older content, entire channels documenting years of tech tutorials risked disappearing in “the blink of an eye.” Another YouTuber behind tech tips account Britec09 warned of this risk after platforms removed one of his videos.
Tech Content Creators Fear YouTube AI Removal Account Bans
The stakes appeared high for everyone, White warned in a video titled “YouTube Tech Channels in Danger!” White had already censored content he planned to post, fearing it wouldn’t be worth the risk of potentially losing his account. His channel began in 2020 as a side hustle but has since become his primary source of income. If he continues to change posted content to avoid YouTube penalties, it could hurt his account’s reach and monetization.
Britec told Ars that he paused a sponsorship due to uncertainty. He said this has already hurt his channel and caused a “great loss of income.” YouTube enforces strict policies, swiftly removing accounts that receive three strikes for violating community guidelines within 90 days. However, curiously, White had not received any strikes following his content removals.
Although Britec reported his account received a strike following his video’s removal, White told Ars that YouTube only gave him two warnings. Therefore, his account does not yet face risk of a ban.
Creators Speculate About YouTube AI Removal Reasons
Creators weren’t sure why YouTube might deem this content harmful. Consequently, they tossed around some theories. It seemed possible, White suggested in his video, that AI was detecting this content as “piracy.” However, that shouldn’t be the case, he claimed, since his guides require users to have valid licenses to install Windows 11.
He also thinks it’s unlikely that Microsoft prompted the takedowns. Tech content creators have a “love-hate relationship” with the tech company, he suggested. “They don’t like what we’re doing, but I don’t think they’re going to get rid of it,” White told Ars. He suggested that Microsoft “could stop us in our tracks” if motivated to end workarounds. But Microsoft doesn’t do that, White said.
Perhaps Microsoft benefits from popular tutorials that attract swarms of Windows 11 users who otherwise may not use “their flagship operating system” if they can’t bypass Microsoft account requirements. Those users could become loyal to Microsoft, White said. Eventually, some users may even “get tired of bypassing the Microsoft account requirements.” Alternatively, Microsoft will add a new feature they’ll happily get the account for, White suggested in his video. “At least some people will, not me,” he added. Microsoft declined Ars’ request to comment.
YouTube AI Removal Moderation Theory Emerges Among Creators
To White, it seemed possible that YouTube was leaning on AI to catch more violations. Perhaps the platform recognized the risk of over-moderation. Therefore, it wasn’t allowing AI to issue strikes on his account. However, that was just a “theory” that he and other creators came up with but couldn’t confirm.
YouTube’s chatbot that supports creators seemed to also be “suspiciously AI-driven,” White said. It seemingly auto-responds even when a “supervisor” connects, he said in his video. Absent more clarity from YouTube, creators who post tutorials, tech tips, and computer repair videos felt spooked. Their biggest fear was that unexpected changes to automated content moderation could unexpectedly knock them off YouTube.
This would happen for posting videos that in tech circles seem ordinary and commonplace, White and Britec said. “We are not even sure what we can make videos on,” White said. “Everything’s a theory right now because we don’t have anything solid from YouTube.”
YouTube Recommends Content Despite AI Removal Policies
White’s channel gained popularity after YouTube highlighted an early trending video showing a workaround to install Windows 11 on unsupported hardware. Following that video, his channel’s views spiked. Then he gradually built up his subscriber base to around 330,000.
In the past, platforms had flagged White’s videos in that category as violative. However, human review got them quickly reinstated. “They were striked for the same reason, but at that time, I guess the AI revolution hadn’t taken over,” White said. “So it was relatively easy to talk to a real person. And by talking to a real person, they were like, ‘Yeah, this is stupid.’ And they brought the videos back.”
Now, YouTube suggests that human review causes the removals. This likely doesn’t completely ease creators’ fears about arbitrary takedowns. Britec’s video also received a flag as dangerous or harmful. He has managed his account that currently has nearly 900,000 subscribers since 2009. He’s worried he risked losing “years of hard work,” he said in his video.
Platform Contradicts Own Content Recommendations
Britec told Ars that “it’s very confusing” for panicked tech content creators trying to understand what content platforms permit. It’s particularly frustrating, he noted in his video, that YouTube’s creator tool inspiring “ideas” for posts seemed to contradict the mods’ content warnings.
The tool continued to recommend that creators make content on specific topics like workarounds to install Windows 11 on unsupported hardware. “This tool was to give you ideas for your next video,” Britec said. “And you can see right here, it’s telling you to create content on these topics. And if you did this, I can guarantee you your channel will get a strike.”
YouTube AI Removal Appeal Process Raises Automation Concerns
From there, creators hit what White described as a “brick wall.” Platforms denied one of his appeals within one minute, which felt like it must be an automated decision. As Britec explained, “You will appeal, and your appeal will be rejected instantly. You will not be speaking to a human being. You’ll be speaking to a bot or AI. The bot will be giving you automated responses.”
YouTube insisted that the decisions weren’t automated, even when platforms denied an appeal within one minute. White told Ars that it’s easy for creators to feel discouraged and censor their channels rather than fight with the AI.
After wasting “an hour and a half trying to reason with an AI about why I didn’t violate the community guidelines” once platforms quickly denied his first appeal, he “didn’t even bother using the chat function” after the second appeal denial came even faster. “I simply wasn’t going to do that again,” White said.
Browse more articles in: AI & ML | Cloud & DevOps | Cybersecurity | Hardware & IoT | Mobile & Apps | News | Software
Join the Discussion
Get article announcements and breaking tech news in our Facebook community!