Uber infrastructure benchmarking has become a critical pillar of how the company evaluates cloud platforms, hardware generations, and system-level changes. As Uber’s infrastructure footprint continues to expand across providers and architectures, traditional application-level metrics no longer provide enough insight.
Instead of asking whether an app feels faster, Uber now asks a deeper question: how does the infrastructure behave under real production conditions? To answer that, the company built an internal benchmarking framework designed to deliver consistent, repeatable, and data-driven performance signals across environments.
Why Uber infrastructure benchmarking goes beyond applications
At Uber’s scale, infrastructure testing used to depend heavily on manual effort. Engineers often ran isolated benchmarks, collected results in spreadsheets, and compared numbers across teams with limited context. As a result, reproducing outcomes became difficult, and performance discussions often relied on incomplete data.
However, infrastructure complexity increased rapidly. New cloud SKUs, frequent kernel updates, firmware changes, and hardware refresh cycles introduced subtle performance differences that application metrics failed to capture. Therefore, Uber needed a way to evaluate infrastructure behavior directly, not just through downstream services.
Uber infrastructure benchmarking with Ceilometer
To solve this challenge, Uber created Ceilometer, an internal adaptive benchmarking platform. The goal was simple but ambitious: standardize how infrastructure performance gets measured, compared, and analyzed across the entire fleet.
Ceilometer operates as a distributed system. It coordinates benchmark execution across dedicated machines, runs tests in parallel, and captures raw outputs at scale. Meanwhile, durable storage preserves benchmark artifacts so teams can reanalyze results later without rerunning experiments.
After execution, the system validates and normalizes results before ingesting them into Uber’s centralized data warehouse. Consequently, engineers can query benchmark data alongside production metrics using a shared data model.
How Uber infrastructure benchmarking mirrors production workloads
A key strength of Uber infrastructure benchmarking lies in how closely Ceilometer mirrors real-world workloads. Instead of relying on a single benchmark type, the framework supports a broad spectrum of test scenarios.
For low-level characterization, Uber uses synthetic benchmarks to measure CPU, memory, storage, and network behavior. These tests establish a baseline and help isolate hardware-level differences.
However, synthetic benchmarks alone are not enough. Therefore, Ceilometer integrates with Uber’s internal platforms to evaluate realistic workloads. Stateful systems run database benchmarks under production-like conditions, while stateless services rely on adaptive load testing to simulate real traffic patterns.
As a result, engineers gain a clearer picture of how infrastructure choices affect actual system behavior.
Uber infrastructure benchmarking for cloud SKU qualification
One of the most important use cases for Uber infrastructure benchmarking is cloud SKU qualification. Before onboarding new server shapes, Uber needs confidence that expected performance matches reality.
Ceilometer enables cloud providers and hardware vendors to run standardized benchmark suites in their own environments. They can then share results with Uber, allowing engineers to evaluate performance characteristics before deployment.
This approach reduces onboarding risk. Moreover, it creates a common language for performance discussions between Uber and its partners.
Validating infrastructure changes with confidence
Infrastructure changes rarely happen in isolation. Kernel upgrades, configuration tuning, firmware updates, and software rollouts often overlap. As a result, diagnosing regressions can become difficult.
Ceilometer addresses this problem by enabling targeted benchmarks before and after specific changes. Engineers can compare results across time, environments, and workload types. Therefore, they can pinpoint whether a regression stems from hardware, software, or configuration differences.
Instead of relying on intuition, teams rely on repeatable data.
Beyond benchmarking toward proactive insights
Looking ahead, Uber plans to evolve Uber infrastructure benchmarking beyond reactive measurement. The team is expanding Ceilometer with more advanced capabilities.
Planned enhancements include machine learning models that predict regressions before they reach production. In addition, anomaly detection will help surface unexpected performance deviations faster. Engineers also plan to introduce more granular component-level metrics to improve visibility into CPU, memory, storage, and network utilization.
Ultimately, Uber aims to use Ceilometer for continuous validation. Automated, recurring benchmark runs could act as canaries, alerting teams when performance thresholds break.
Why Uber infrastructure benchmarking matters
Overall, Ceilometer represents a shift in how large-scale systems evaluate infrastructure. Instead of treating benchmarking as an occasional task, Uber treats it as an ongoing signal that guides platform decisions.
This approach enables better hardware and software co-design, faster iteration, and more predictable performance outcomes. Moreover, it highlights a broader industry trend: as infrastructure grows more heterogeneous, benchmarking must grow more intelligent.
Final thoughts
Uber infrastructure benchmarking shows how modern cloud-scale systems move beyond surface-level metrics. By grounding decisions in production-like benchmarks, Uber gains deeper insight into how infrastructure truly behaves.
As cloud platforms and hardware continue to evolve, frameworks like Ceilometer will likely become essential tools for companies operating at scale.
Read also
Join the discussion in our Facebook community.