The antitrust fight over the Google adtech monopoly is entering a decisive phase. After years of disputes between Google and the US Department of Justice, the court is now preparing for a ruling that could reshape the digital advertising industry. Both sides recently delivered their final arguments, and the presiding judge signaled that she wants to act quickly. This urgency could limit Google’s ability to delay the outcome through an appeal.
Why the Google adtech monopoly case is reaching a critical moment
The Justice Department argues that Google has used its power to dominate online advertising from end to end. Earlier in the year, Judge Leonie Brinkema agreed that Google held monopoly control in key areas of ad tech. The discussion has now shifted from proving illegal conduct to deciding what happens next.
During closing statements, Judge Brinkema asked the DOJ how soon corrective action could begin. She also emphasized that “time is of the essence.” Comments like these suggest she wants to issue a remedy before Google can use the appeals process to slow enforcement.
Google warns that breaking up its ad business would backfire
Google’s attorney, Karen Dunn, pushed back strongly. She argued that forcing Google to sell its core ad tech unit would be extreme. According to her, the move could harm customers, disrupt advertisers and reduce market efficiency. She also said that any structural breakup would create more problems than it solves.
Google plans to appeal if the ruling goes against the company. As Judge Brinkema noted, enforcing a breakup during an appeal would be difficult. Because of this, Google may attempt to delay or weaken the remedy by keeping the legal process active for months, or even years.
Why regulators insist on breaking up the Google adtech monopoly
Regulators say that no smaller remedy will work. They claim Google abused its control of multiple layers of ad tech, including tools that buy ads, tools that sell ads and platforms that run auctions. By owning all these components, Google could allegedly tilt the market toward its own products.
The DOJ argues that without structural separation, Google would still have the ability to shape the digital advertising economy. Fines, oversight or behavioral rules would not solve the underlying issue. In their view, only a breakup can restore competition.
Global pressure intensifies as Europe moves in parallel
The Google adtech monopoly investigation is not limited to the United States. Google recently faced a $3.5 billion fine in the European Union for similar antitrust violations. EU regulators concluded that Google’s advertising practices hurt competition and limited choices for publishers and advertisers.
This parallel pressure increases the stakes of the US ruling. If courts in two major regions take action at the same time, Google could face a large-scale restructuring of its global ad business.
Why this ruling could reshape the digital advertising ecosystem
If Judge Brinkema orders a breakup, the impact could reach far beyond Google. The digital advertising market may see:
- more competition among independent platforms
- greater transparency in pricing and auction processes
- reduced dependence on a single provider
- incentives for new innovation
- better alignment between publishers and advertisers
Many analysts believe the industry’s current structure gives Google too much control over how ads are bought and sold. A breakup could reduce friction and create a more open marketplace.
Concerns about timing and delayed enforcement
Although momentum is building, regulators fear that enforcement could stall. If Google appeals immediately, the remedy could be put on hold. Judge Brinkema admitted that any action “would not be as easily enforceable” while an appeal is pending.
This creates a race against the clock. Regulators want to implement changes quickly. Google, meanwhile, aims to slow the process enough to influence or alter the final outcome.
What comes next in the Google adtech monopoly case
The court is expected to issue its decision soon. If the judge orders a breakup, Google will likely appeal, potentially sending the case into a long legal battle. Alternatively, the ruling could focus on a more limited set of remedies, though regulators view that option as insufficient.
Whatever the decision, the case is shaping up to be one of the most significant antitrust rulings since the Microsoft decision more than 20 years ago. Its impact will extend across the digital economy, influencing how tech giants grow and how regulators control their power.
Conclusion
The Google adtech monopoly ruling will set a precedent for the future of digital advertising. Whether the judge orders a breakup or another remedy, the decision will influence competition, transparency and the balance of power across the internet. As the case enters its final stage, the industry watches closely, knowing the outcome could redefine how online advertising works.
Read also
Join the discussion in our Facebook community.