Amazon’s latest move into satellite internet marks one of the most ambitious expansions of its global infrastructure in years. The debut of the Leo Ultra terminal — alongside the rebranding of Project Kuiper to Amazon Leo — signals the company’s intent to compete directly with the biggest player in the sector: SpaceX’s Starlink. As Amazon prepares its enterprise preview for 2025 and broader rollout in 2026, the Amazon Leo vs Starlink comparison is becoming increasingly relevant for organizations evaluating next-generation connectivity options.
Amazon Leo vs Starlink: Amazon introduces gigabit-class enterprise hardware
Amazon’s new Leo Ultra terminal is the centerpiece of its upcoming network. It’s a large, high-throughput phased-array antenna designed specifically for fixed enterprise installations. Moreover, the device supports up to 1 Gbps download speeds and 400 Mbps uploads thanks to its simultaneous full-duplex architecture. This places it squarely in competition with Starlink’s high-performance business hardware.
Although Amazon’s satellite service remains in early deployment, the design of Leo Ultra indicates a long-term vision focused on robust, cloud-centric connectivity. Meanwhile, Amazon also showcased two additional terminals: a mid-size Leo Pro unit for portable or vehicle-mounted use, and a compact Leo Nano antenna capable of around 100 Mbps. All three devices run on custom Amazon silicon, which in turn ensures consistent performance across the lineup.
Because these terminals share the same waveform, Amazon has laid the groundwork for future upgrades that can propagate across the entire product family, further tightening the battle line in the Amazon Leo vs Starlink matchup.
Amazon Leo vs Starlink: how satellite rollout strategies differ
While Amazon is unveiling enterprise-grade hardware, the constellation behind it is still expanding. As of late 2025, Amazon has launched more than 150 low-Earth-orbit satellites, and multiple mass deployment missions have already taken place this year. Even so, this remains only the beginning. The company plans to launch several thousand satellites to reach global coverage.
In contrast, Starlink has a considerable head start. The SpaceX network already includes several thousand active satellites and delivers service to consumers, mobility fleets and industries worldwide. Consequently, Starlink enjoys a dominant early-mover advantage.
However, Amazon is not attempting to mirror Starlink identically. Instead, the company is positioning Leo as a cloud-integrated connectivity layer tied directly into AWS. This difference gives Amazon a unique strategic angle as competition intensifies.
Why cloud integration changes the Amazon Leo vs Starlink equation
Perhaps the most defining advantage for Amazon is its Direct to AWS (D2A) architecture. This feature allows satellite traffic to route straight from Leo terminals into AWS workloads without traversing the public internet. As a result, enterprises gain improved security, lower latency in cloud operations and more predictable performance.
Industries such as logistics, shipping, scientific research, energy, emergency response and remote industrial operations can all benefit from this kind of architecture. Conversely, Starlink operates as a more traditional internet service. Although it is widely available and highly capable, it doesn’t provide native cloud integration at the scale Amazon can offer.
Therefore, in an Amazon Leo vs Starlink comparison, the differentiator is not only speed. It’s the direct link into cloud-native workflows — a capability that could reshape the value proposition for enterprise users.
Amazon Leo vs Starlink: performance, terminals and mobility
Starlink currently offers multiple terminals across consumer, business and mobility markets. Its business-grade antennas deliver strong performance, especially for aviation and maritime sectors where reliability and throughput matter most.
Meanwhile, Amazon’s Leo Ultra positions itself at the higher end of enterprise hardware. Although both systems are designed for demanding environments, Amazon’s full-duplex phased-array system and custom silicon aim to provide consistent throughput under complex workloads. Additionally, Amazon’s approach to terminal sizing — from Ultra to Nano — suggests a modular ecosystem that can scale for different deployment environments.
Nevertheless, it’s important to acknowledge a key reality: Starlink is already serving customers, while Amazon is still building out its network. Therefore, short-term comparisons favor Starlink. Long-term, however, the competition may shift once Amazon begins full-scale service.
When pricing enters the Amazon Leo vs Starlink debate
Amazon has not yet released pricing details for Leo Ultra or its service tiers. Even so, analysts expect the company to position itself competitively with Starlink’s business and mobility offerings. Because Amazon is entering the market later, pricing could become an important lever.
Starlink currently offers several options for residential, business and mobile use cases. Meanwhile, Amazon appears focused on enterprise connectivity first, suggesting a high-value segment approach. Once pricing becomes public, the Amazon Leo vs Starlink comparison will likely evolve further.
The long-term vision behind Amazon Leo vs Starlink
Jeff Bezos has previously discussed the possibility of deploying space-based data centers within 10 to 20 years. If such a roadmap materializes, Amazon Leo could eventually become more than a satellite internet service — it could function as part of a distributed cloud architecture in orbit.
Starlink’s long-term ambitions differ. SpaceX is prioritizing internet coverage, mobility integrations and direct-to-cell capabilities in partnership with terrestrial carriers. Because both companies are pursuing different future infrastructures, competition may broaden rather than narrow.
What Amazon Leo vs Starlink means for customers
Amazon is still in the early phase of deployment, yet the company’s strategy is clear: high throughput, cloud integration and enterprise-focused design. Meanwhile, Starlink remains the global incumbent with proven availability.
Ultimately, the Amazon Leo vs Starlink matchup reflects two contrasting visions for the future of global connectivity. One is cloud-centric and enterprise-first. The other is broad, accessible and already at scale. As Amazon prepares for its 2026 rollout, the satellite internet landscape is set for one of its biggest competitive shifts yet.
Read also
Join the discussion in our Facebook community.