The Meta antitrust ruling has closed one of the most significant legal threats the company has faced. A federal judge decided that the FTC failed to prove that Meta currently holds monopoly power. As a result, the company will not be forced to separate Instagram or WhatsApp.
Why the Meta antitrust ruling is a major win for the company
The FTC first sued Meta in 2020. The agency claimed that Meta weakened competition by buying Instagram and WhatsApp before they could grow on their own.
However, Meta argued that both apps expanded because of its investment. It also highlighted that TikTok’s rise shows the market is highly competitive.
Because of these changes, Judge James Boasberg ruled that the FTC did not meet the legal standard. Moreover, he noted that the agency could not show Meta’s monopoly power in the present day.
How the Meta antitrust ruling weakened the FTC’s argument
The FTC described a narrow market called “personal social networking.” It tried to exclude TikTok and YouTube from that definition.
However, the judge disagreed. In his view, TikTok alone is too influential to ignore. Therefore, he ruled that TikTok belongs in the market the FTC described. Once he reached that conclusion, he found that Meta could not be considered a monopoly.
Additionally, consumer behavior has shifted since Meta bought Instagram and WhatsApp. According to the judge, these changes weakened the FTC’s argument.
What this means for Instagram and WhatsApp
If the FTC had won, Meta might have faced a forced breakup. This would have reshaped the social media landscape and affected billions of users.
Instead, both platforms remain under Meta’s control. The company can continue building a connected ecosystem across messaging, video and AI products.
The FTC can still appeal the Meta antitrust ruling, but it has not confirmed any plans. Even so, overturning the decision would be difficult.
Meta reacts to the decision
Meta welcomed the outcome. A spokesperson said the ruling shows that the company faces intense competition. They also noted that Meta’s products support both people and businesses.
Executives including Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg and Kevin Systrom testified earlier in the case. Their statements emphasized how quickly the market shifts and how much pressure TikTok created.
TikTok’s influence was impossible to ignore
TikTok played a central role in the ruling. Its rapid growth changed how people spend time online. As a result, the judge saw it as a direct competitor to Meta.
Zuckerberg testified that Meta’s growth slowed significantly as TikTok became more popular. That evidence strengthened Meta’s claim that it does not control the market.
Because of this, the judge determined that a monopoly claim no longer reflects the reality of the social media industry.
What comes next for Meta and US regulators
The ruling is a major milestone for Meta. It protects the company’s structure and its ownership of Instagram and WhatsApp.
However, regulators may continue to examine Meta’s future actions. While this case is over, the broader conversation about Big Tech oversight is not.
For now, though, Meta remains intact. And the Meta antitrust ruling shows how challenging it is to prove monopoly power in a rapidly evolving market.
Read also
Join the discussion in our Facebook community.